Converting VHS
Video Tapes to DVD

 

    Home

    About Us
      Michael Cocke
      Evelyne Stalzer

    General Articles
      Backup Strategy
      Spam
      Viruses

    Technical Articles
      Converting Video:       VHS to DVD
      Mike's Notebooks

    Resumes
      Michael Cocke
          (HTML)
      Evelyne Stalzer
          (HTML)

    Contact Us

 

 

 

There are a number of products available to capture the output of a VHS player into a computer. The quality and results vary, as one would expect. After trying several consumer-level products, here are my conclusions.

Belkin makes a USB device they call the Videobus II. This unit is adequate as a starting point if you are looking to get your feet wet, but I was unhappy with both the sync range and the resolution. The extreme top and bottom of the picture weren't captured properly and the video was pretty fuzzy.

Note that Belkin has one of the worst commercial web sites I've seen. If you search for the model number of the Videobus (FSU207), you won't find anything. Search for "Videobus" to see the specs.

Pinnacle sells two USB video converters. The DVC (Dazzle Video Converter) 80 is very similar to the Belkin unit mentioned above, but the sync and resolution of the DVC 80 are acceptable. The other unit is the DVC 150. This is a much improved and upgraded unit with some additional capabilities. If you install the DVC 150 and have high speed USB 2.0 ports, you should be pleased with the result.

Unfortunately, both of the Pinnacle units come with the Pinnacle software. Not one installation of Pinnacle Studio 8 worked according to spec - not any version, not on any hardware platform.

Like most video software, Pinnacle Studio 8 is supposed to cover three main areas of video processing: capture, editing, and burning. The basic ability to communicate with the DVC units worked well enough to capture video to an MPEG-2 file. Editing worked intermittently. Burning to DVD has never worked properly, producing a wide array of symptoms and a lifetime supply of plastic coasters.

Pinnacle's tech support department is better than most and has tried to be helpful, but ultimately they were unsuccessful in getting Pinnacle 8 to work on any of three different computers, even after the removal of other software and the reconfiguration of the system according to tech support's recommendations. (To demonstrate that it was not a hardware limitation or a software conflict, Pinnacle Studio 8 was also installed on a 2.4 Ghz system with an Intel CPU, 1 Gb of ram and nothing but Windows XP installed.)

Basically, the Pinnacle software just didn't work properly, especially when it came to outputting the video. It's a darned shame, because the video editor user interface is quite the best I've seen so far.

ATI makes several different television interface devices, which as a side benefit work very nicely as video capture devices. I use the All-In-Wonder and the TV Wonder. If you are considering one of these units, I'd recommend the All-In-Wonder overall because it has more features, but either would perform the basic job well. Unfortunately, ATI includes the unacceptable Pinnacle software.

Given the limited success with the Pinnacle software, I use Pinnacle Studio 8 only to capture from the DVC 150 to an MPEG-2 file. Then I use Roxio Easy Media Creator™ 7 to edit the video and burn the final product to a DVD. I don't care for the user interface of the Roxio video editor - it's more cumbersome to use and somewhat counterintuitive. But at least it worked, which was a pleasant change. The Roxio software would really benefit from a tutorial, but Roxio doesn't provide much in the way of documentation with this version. (They've even done away with the printed manual.)

A DVD will hold, at maximum video quality, about an hour of video. Very few movies will fit into that one hour. Compressing the video would solve that, but it would also cause additional degradation of the signal quality. (There is already some degradation from the process of converting analog to digital.) A decision has to be made: compress the video to fit on a single DVD and accept a lower resulting video quality, or split the video onto multiple DVDs.

If you decide to split the video, you need to choose where to make the split. This is more a matter of taste and style than technical ability. At the risk of stating the obvious, you want to split the video at a point that won't frustrate you at having to stop and change disks. The shower scene in Hitchcock's "Psycho" is an example of where NOT to split a movie. Whatever video editor you have chosen should be able to cut the second part of your video to a new project and allow you to burn each project to a separate DVD. There is your video, parts 1 and 2. Done.

I've been in contact with Pinnacle Software (They really are trying, I have to give them that!) and have received Studio 9. Unfortunately, Studio 9 has the same problems with burning a DVD from an MPEG file that the previous versions did. Evelyne and I have done a considerable amount of research on this, and I can tell you that the bug is limited to burning a DVD from an MPEG file. If you capture or convert from an AVI file, the process works correctly. There's also a way to force an MPEG to burn by prepending a bit of their demonstration MPEG to the front of your video, so I'm pretty certain that the bug is in the reading/rendering of the MPEG file. I've passed this info along to Pinnacle, so I expect to see a fix soon.

Commentary:

Depending on where you live, there may be a legal problem with converting a VHS tape to a DVD. The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) and MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) want you to purchase as many copies of a movie or audio disk as possible, and at least as many as you have players. If your child ruins one of your disks or tapes, they want you to purchase still another copy. What I think of their position cannot be expressed in polite language, but be aware that they are trying to make "fair use" and "private use" illegal and may be succeeding in some places. Time will tell.

I feel strongly that these kinds of actions by the RIAA and the MPAA are unethical. They are in effect selling me a product and then threatening to sue me or criminalize my actions if they don't like how I use it in the privacy of my own home.

Please note that while I have strong exceptions to their attempts to outlaw my ability to use what I have paid for, I do not condone piracy or theft of intellectual property. I just feel that the RIAA and MPAA have drawn their line in the wrong place, and I protest their actions to rewrite copyright law to turn reasonable consumers into victims of their legal vendetta.

 

by Michael W. Cocke

 

 

 

 

TV / Video Tidbits

 

The vertical height of a TV screen is 525 scan lines. The screen refresh starts in the upper left corner and ends at the lower right.

 

 

Television in North America follows the NTSC standard. The vertical refresh rate is 30 times per second, based on the electric current at 60 cycles per second.

Television in Europe follows the PAL standard. The vertical refresh rate is 25 times per second, based on the electric current at 50 cycles per second.

 

 

The horizontal refresh rate is much faster than the vertical rate - a bit over 14,000 times per second.

 

 

There is no way for the capture equipment to tell the video signal to slow down. If the computer hardware and software cannot keep up, portions of the video will be lost.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last updated:   Tuesday, February 28, 2006 .
Copyright 2003, 2004 by MWC Enterprises.